"The difference is not between conventional and alternative medicine. It is between medicine that can be patented and controlled for profit and medicine that cannot be."
Elliott Freed
Government Science
In 1999 the CDC found a 760% increase in diagnoses of autism in children who received 25 micrograms of mercury via vaccination in their first month of life compared to those who received none in that time period. Considering this is in all likelihood from just one vaccine, not the entire schedule of vaccines recommended for school entry, this is huge increase that points to the possibility of an even more massive one.
Click here to read their summary of their initial findings.
Click here to read excerpts of the minutes from the meeting where they first discuss these findings.
When the CDC studied the link between vaccines and autism in 1999 they found a 765% increased risk of autism from vaccines.
At a meeting convened near Atlanta, Georgia, in early 2000, at the Simpsonwood Conference Center, the CDC brought together interested parties to decide how to proceed. They decided to manipulate the numbers until the link disappeared. It took them at least four iterations to make this happen, over the course of four years. It was that final paper, published in late 2003, that is the source for the claim that the link between autism and vaccines has been shown not to exist.
Dr. Verstraeten, the epidemiologist in charge of the study, at the meeting said,
“…we have found statistically significant relationships between the exposure and outcomes for these different exposures and outcomes. First, for two months of age, an unspecified developmental delay, which has its own specific ICD9 code. Exposure at three months of age, Tics. Exposure at six months of age, an attention deficit disorder. Exposure at one, three and six months of age, language and speech delays which are two separate ICD9 codes. Exposures at one, three and six months of age, the entire category of neurodevelopmental delays, which includes all of these plus a number of other disorders."
Dr. Clemens, whose job was to oversee the vaccine movement, responded to results of the study thusly, "I am really concerned that we have taken off like a boat going down one arm of the mangrove swamp at high speed, when in fact there was not enough discussion really early on about which way the boat should go at all. And I really want to risk offending everyone in the room by saying that perhaps this study should not have been done at all, because the outcome of it could have, to some extent, been predicted, and we have all reached this point now where we are left hanging."
As in, "of course we knew injecting neurotoxins into new born infants would cause neurological problems."
Dr. Clemens went on to say that his job was to make sure kids got vaccinated and he did not care what this study said, he was going to continue pushing vaccines.
Click here to read the transcript of the meeting.
The CDC then initiated another study of a population in Atlanta, Georgia, near their headquarters. The idea was to discover whether or not there was indeed a statistical correlation between the mmr vaccine and autism diagnoses. In organizing the data they collected for that study they found there was a relationship. They convened a meeting to throw the relevant data in the trash, literally bringing a big trash can into the conference room and throwing uncooperative data into it. One of the five researchers involved kept his files.
Click here to read the data thrown in the trash by the CDC. One of the five researchers responsible kept his copies and sat on them for a decade. He finally handed them over to congress and now they are available for the public.
Click here to read their summary of their initial findings.
Click here to read excerpts of the minutes from the meeting where they first discuss these findings.
When the CDC studied the link between vaccines and autism in 1999 they found a 765% increased risk of autism from vaccines.
At a meeting convened near Atlanta, Georgia, in early 2000, at the Simpsonwood Conference Center, the CDC brought together interested parties to decide how to proceed. They decided to manipulate the numbers until the link disappeared. It took them at least four iterations to make this happen, over the course of four years. It was that final paper, published in late 2003, that is the source for the claim that the link between autism and vaccines has been shown not to exist.
Dr. Verstraeten, the epidemiologist in charge of the study, at the meeting said,
“…we have found statistically significant relationships between the exposure and outcomes for these different exposures and outcomes. First, for two months of age, an unspecified developmental delay, which has its own specific ICD9 code. Exposure at three months of age, Tics. Exposure at six months of age, an attention deficit disorder. Exposure at one, three and six months of age, language and speech delays which are two separate ICD9 codes. Exposures at one, three and six months of age, the entire category of neurodevelopmental delays, which includes all of these plus a number of other disorders."
Dr. Clemens, whose job was to oversee the vaccine movement, responded to results of the study thusly, "I am really concerned that we have taken off like a boat going down one arm of the mangrove swamp at high speed, when in fact there was not enough discussion really early on about which way the boat should go at all. And I really want to risk offending everyone in the room by saying that perhaps this study should not have been done at all, because the outcome of it could have, to some extent, been predicted, and we have all reached this point now where we are left hanging."
As in, "of course we knew injecting neurotoxins into new born infants would cause neurological problems."
Dr. Clemens went on to say that his job was to make sure kids got vaccinated and he did not care what this study said, he was going to continue pushing vaccines.
Click here to read the transcript of the meeting.
The CDC then initiated another study of a population in Atlanta, Georgia, near their headquarters. The idea was to discover whether or not there was indeed a statistical correlation between the mmr vaccine and autism diagnoses. In organizing the data they collected for that study they found there was a relationship. They convened a meeting to throw the relevant data in the trash, literally bringing a big trash can into the conference room and throwing uncooperative data into it. One of the five researchers involved kept his files.
Click here to read the data thrown in the trash by the CDC. One of the five researchers responsible kept his copies and sat on them for a decade. He finally handed them over to congress and now they are available for the public.
In 2008, Bernadine Healy, M.D., former director of the National Institutes of Health, wrote critically of the suppression of unbiased vaccine research:
"The Institute of Medicine in its last report on vaccines and autism in 2004 said that more research on the vaccine question is counterproductive: Finding a susceptibility to this risk in some infants would call into question the universal vaccination strategy that is a bedrock of immunization programs and could lead to widespread rejection of vaccines. The IOM concluded that efforts to find a link between vaccines and autism 'must be balanced against the broader benefit of the current vaccine program for all children.' Wow. Medicine has moved ahead only because doctors, researchers, and yes, families, have openly challenged even the most sacred medical dogma."
"The Institute of Medicine in its last report on vaccines and autism in 2004 said that more research on the vaccine question is counterproductive: Finding a susceptibility to this risk in some infants would call into question the universal vaccination strategy that is a bedrock of immunization programs and could lead to widespread rejection of vaccines. The IOM concluded that efforts to find a link between vaccines and autism 'must be balanced against the broader benefit of the current vaccine program for all children.' Wow. Medicine has moved ahead only because doctors, researchers, and yes, families, have openly challenged even the most sacred medical dogma."
The government can not ever admit that vaccines cause autism. If they did, they'd be fucked. To the tune of a hundred billion dollars a year or more.
In 1986 congress passed a law absolving vaccine manufacturers of all liability. In place of the ability of consumers to sue vaccine manufacturers, the government levied a penalty on manufacturers of seventy five cents per vaccine up front. They put that money into a trust fund that is used to pay consumers for vaccine injury.
Click here to visit the website of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a program of the U.S. Health and Human Services Department.
Claims of vaccine injury are heard in a special court. In the beginning most cases were conceded and plaintiffs paid. As claims have risen steeply in the past twenty years, the odds of being paid have dropped precipitously.
Initially payments were made for cases of autism. The court was set up as "no fault." This means that nobody had to go on official record stating that the vaccine caused the injury. It is for this reason that despite the payments, it is still legal to say that "no link has been established." When the number of such claims related to autism began climbing steeply, the special court postponed thousands of cases for years. Eventually they lumped them all into an "omnibus hearing." At this hearing they used three test cases to determine if the vaccines caused autism.
Click here to watch a five minute video explaining how the vaccine court is used to cover up the link between vaccines and autism.
If the verdict had been yes, not only would thousands of pending cases, nearly equal to the total number of payouts to that point for all vaccine injuries, have been eligible for payouts of millions of dollars each, but tens of thousands of new cases a year would all of a sudden become eligible. The cost of paying on these cases could run into the tens of billions of dollars per year. Possibly even in the neighborhood of a hundred billion dollars per year or more.
The former head of the CDC, Dr. Julie Gerberding has acknowledged on CNN that vaccines can cause "autism like symptoms." Click here to view the video. Autism is defined as "autism like symptoms." The Institute of Medicine, an organization that councils the federal government on medical issues, including vaccination, has acknowledged the same. Thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies have been published in the professional literature demonstrating the causal mechanisms.
Yet they continue with the legalistic refrains. If they acknowledge the causal link, what will happen? Where will those hundreds of billions of dollars come from to pay the families? To pay for the lifetime of care needed for the people maimed by the vaccines?
Imagine you are a member of a team of federal bureaucrats and your task is to figure out how to deal with this problem. What do you do?
In 1986 congress passed a law absolving vaccine manufacturers of all liability. In place of the ability of consumers to sue vaccine manufacturers, the government levied a penalty on manufacturers of seventy five cents per vaccine up front. They put that money into a trust fund that is used to pay consumers for vaccine injury.
Click here to visit the website of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a program of the U.S. Health and Human Services Department.
Claims of vaccine injury are heard in a special court. In the beginning most cases were conceded and plaintiffs paid. As claims have risen steeply in the past twenty years, the odds of being paid have dropped precipitously.
Initially payments were made for cases of autism. The court was set up as "no fault." This means that nobody had to go on official record stating that the vaccine caused the injury. It is for this reason that despite the payments, it is still legal to say that "no link has been established." When the number of such claims related to autism began climbing steeply, the special court postponed thousands of cases for years. Eventually they lumped them all into an "omnibus hearing." At this hearing they used three test cases to determine if the vaccines caused autism.
Click here to watch a five minute video explaining how the vaccine court is used to cover up the link between vaccines and autism.
If the verdict had been yes, not only would thousands of pending cases, nearly equal to the total number of payouts to that point for all vaccine injuries, have been eligible for payouts of millions of dollars each, but tens of thousands of new cases a year would all of a sudden become eligible. The cost of paying on these cases could run into the tens of billions of dollars per year. Possibly even in the neighborhood of a hundred billion dollars per year or more.
The former head of the CDC, Dr. Julie Gerberding has acknowledged on CNN that vaccines can cause "autism like symptoms." Click here to view the video. Autism is defined as "autism like symptoms." The Institute of Medicine, an organization that councils the federal government on medical issues, including vaccination, has acknowledged the same. Thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies have been published in the professional literature demonstrating the causal mechanisms.
Yet they continue with the legalistic refrains. If they acknowledge the causal link, what will happen? Where will those hundreds of billions of dollars come from to pay the families? To pay for the lifetime of care needed for the people maimed by the vaccines?
Imagine you are a member of a team of federal bureaucrats and your task is to figure out how to deal with this problem. What do you do?
"The co authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents relating to the study."
"They all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room."
Click here to watch Florida Congressman Bill Posey quote Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist from the CDC describe the way they perform "science" when studying the relationship between autism and vaccines.
Click here to read an article on the deceit by Sharyl Attkisson, including a transcript of Rep. Posey's speech on the floor of congress.
Click here to read a timeline of Dr. Thompson's disclosures and related events.
Click here to read the abstract of a paper published in October, 2014 in the "Indian Journal of Medical Ethics." It was written by the Senior Registrar, Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Tis Hazari, Delhi, India and the Head of Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Tis Hazari, Delhi 110 054 India.
"They all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room."
Click here to watch Florida Congressman Bill Posey quote Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist from the CDC describe the way they perform "science" when studying the relationship between autism and vaccines.
Click here to read an article on the deceit by Sharyl Attkisson, including a transcript of Rep. Posey's speech on the floor of congress.
Click here to read a timeline of Dr. Thompson's disclosures and related events.
Click here to read the abstract of a paper published in October, 2014 in the "Indian Journal of Medical Ethics." It was written by the Senior Registrar, Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Tis Hazari, Delhi, India and the Head of Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Tis Hazari, Delhi 110 054 India.
Here, Dr. Thompson, one of the CDC researchers responsible for the claims that vaccines have been proven safe acknowledges in a phone conversation that he would never give a thimerosal containing vaccine like the flu shot to his pregnant wife. He also states that it is likely that thimerosal causes autism like symptoms.
Click here to listen to a short clip on youtube from one of the conversations between Dr. Thompson and Dr. Brian Hooker, a senior government scientist whom Dr. Thompson contacted when he decided to blow the whistle.
Click here to listen to a short clip on youtube from one of the conversations between Dr. Thompson and Dr. Brian Hooker, a senior government scientist whom Dr. Thompson contacted when he decided to blow the whistle.
Here is a recent publication (early 2015) from the Health Resources and Services Administration Department of the U.S. GOV.
Note how they brag that due to pressures such as the possibility of failure, time constraints and others, four out of five plaintiffs agree to settle out of court. This keeps the court from having to acknowledge on the legal record that the vaccine caused the injury.
They also brag about how few people are compensated through the program. Roughly one family is compensated out of every million doses given. Assuming the average kid receives about forty doses, this still means one in twenty five thousand vaccine recipients is awarded compensation for injuries.
They further brag that only one in three applicants is awarded compensation. This means one in eight thousand is injured, but two of them are not compensated.
Considering that based on a rough estimate of just over half a million injury reports filed roughly one in forty reports of injury is adjudicated we are now down to about one in two hundred vaccine recipients being injured.
Since only one in one hundred injuries is reported we can estimate that roughly one out of two vaccine recipients is injured by vaccines in an overt way. This falls within the range predicted by the pre approval trials done by the manufacturers which they publish in the vaccine inserts and the anecdotal reports of all the parents who told their doctor about their child's vaccine injury and were told by their doctor that it was normal.
This report brags about how this system is working exceptionally well to save money and perpetuate the impression that vaccines are safe.
Click here to read the entire nine page report from 2015 on the website of the Health and Human Resources Department of the federal government.
Note how they brag that due to pressures such as the possibility of failure, time constraints and others, four out of five plaintiffs agree to settle out of court. This keeps the court from having to acknowledge on the legal record that the vaccine caused the injury.
They also brag about how few people are compensated through the program. Roughly one family is compensated out of every million doses given. Assuming the average kid receives about forty doses, this still means one in twenty five thousand vaccine recipients is awarded compensation for injuries.
They further brag that only one in three applicants is awarded compensation. This means one in eight thousand is injured, but two of them are not compensated.
Considering that based on a rough estimate of just over half a million injury reports filed roughly one in forty reports of injury is adjudicated we are now down to about one in two hundred vaccine recipients being injured.
Since only one in one hundred injuries is reported we can estimate that roughly one out of two vaccine recipients is injured by vaccines in an overt way. This falls within the range predicted by the pre approval trials done by the manufacturers which they publish in the vaccine inserts and the anecdotal reports of all the parents who told their doctor about their child's vaccine injury and were told by their doctor that it was normal.
This report brags about how this system is working exceptionally well to save money and perpetuate the impression that vaccines are safe.
Click here to read the entire nine page report from 2015 on the website of the Health and Human Resources Department of the federal government.
Evidence of Malfeasance in Research to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe
"There are over 165 studies that have focused on Thimerosal and found it to be harmful... with reported outcomes of death; acrodynia; poisoning; allergic reaction; malformations; auto-immune reaction; Well's syndrome; developmental delay; and neurodevelopmental disorders, including tics, speech delay, language delay, attention deficit disorder, and autism.
In contrast, the CDC states that Thimerosal is safe and there is “no relationship between Thimerosal containing vaccines and autism rates in children.”
This is puzzling because, in a study conducted directly by CDC epidemiologists, a 7.6-fold increased risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy was found.
The CDC's current stance that Thimerosal is safe and that there is no relationship between Thimerosal and autism is based on six specific published epidemiological studies coauthored and sponsored by the CDC.
The purpose of this review is to examine these six publications and analyze possible reasons why their published outcomes are so different from the results of investigations by multiple independent research groups over the past 75+ years."
Click here to read the entire study by researchers from Simpson University, University of Kentucky, University of Texas, Arkansas Children's Hospital and other research centers.
"The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has disclosed that during its most recent review of vaccine safety science in 2011, CDC officials took the unprecedented and telling step of ordering the IOM not to review any of the thimerosal studies.
At that same meeting, IOM’s panel made the seismic decision to reject, as flawed, 17 of the 22 published studies long offered by CDC to 'prove' no link between vaccines and autism."
Click here to read this analysis by RFK Jr. of the science behind the claim by the CDC that vaccines do not cause autism.
In contrast, the CDC states that Thimerosal is safe and there is “no relationship between Thimerosal containing vaccines and autism rates in children.”
This is puzzling because, in a study conducted directly by CDC epidemiologists, a 7.6-fold increased risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy was found.
The CDC's current stance that Thimerosal is safe and that there is no relationship between Thimerosal and autism is based on six specific published epidemiological studies coauthored and sponsored by the CDC.
The purpose of this review is to examine these six publications and analyze possible reasons why their published outcomes are so different from the results of investigations by multiple independent research groups over the past 75+ years."
Click here to read the entire study by researchers from Simpson University, University of Kentucky, University of Texas, Arkansas Children's Hospital and other research centers.
"The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has disclosed that during its most recent review of vaccine safety science in 2011, CDC officials took the unprecedented and telling step of ordering the IOM not to review any of the thimerosal studies.
At that same meeting, IOM’s panel made the seismic decision to reject, as flawed, 17 of the 22 published studies long offered by CDC to 'prove' no link between vaccines and autism."
Click here to read this analysis by RFK Jr. of the science behind the claim by the CDC that vaccines do not cause autism.
The amount of money to be made, without risk
Vaccines are liability free and state governments mandate them. According to the top industry group, there are now 271 in various stages of development.
Click here to see their full color brochure.
Click here to see their full color brochure.
U.S. Ranks 37th in Health Care in the World
"Evidence that other countries perform better than the United States in ensuring the health of their populations is a sure prod to the reformist impulse. The World Health Report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance, ranked the U.S. health care system 37th in the world."
Click here to read the analysis published in the "New England Journal of Medicine" in 2010.
Click here to read the analysis published in the "New England Journal of Medicine" in 2010.
The religion of scientism
"Contrary to the beliefs of some, science is not an impenetrable body of settled fact that must be defended at all costs in the name of truth. When science becomes a worldview—a philosophy of life, a metaphysical framework that explains existence—it is no longer science; it is scientism."
Click here to read the entire article on the rise of scientific fundamentalism.
Click here to read the entire article on the rise of scientific fundamentalism.
Doctors Claim They Learn Nothing About Vaccines in School
Click here to watch a video montage of doctors describing what they learned about vaccines in medical school.
It will unsettle you. If you believe that doctors are well educated about what they recommend, this video will force you to think again. They are just given the recommendations, same as you and I.
It will unsettle you. If you believe that doctors are well educated about what they recommend, this video will force you to think again. They are just given the recommendations, same as you and I.
U.S. Government Has Never Studied Health Outcomes of Vaccines
The CDC acknowledges that they have not studied the health of vaccinated children versus non vaccinated children.
Their logic is tortured. They claim it would be unethical. This is ridiculous on two counts.
First, there are unvaccinated children who can be studied. Second, if they do not know whether or not vaccines improve the health of a child, they are purely experimental.
Withholding an experimental drug from a healthy child is not unethical. In fact, it is the only ethical thing to do.
Click here to watch Dr. Colleen Boyle of the CDC testify in front of the U.S. Congress and acknowledge that the CDC has never studied the health of vaccinated children when compared with the health of non vaccinated children.
Click here to read an article discussing some studies from around the world that have been done on this question. They have all found non vaccinated children to be significantly healthier than vaccinated children.
Their logic is tortured. They claim it would be unethical. This is ridiculous on two counts.
First, there are unvaccinated children who can be studied. Second, if they do not know whether or not vaccines improve the health of a child, they are purely experimental.
Withholding an experimental drug from a healthy child is not unethical. In fact, it is the only ethical thing to do.
Click here to watch Dr. Colleen Boyle of the CDC testify in front of the U.S. Congress and acknowledge that the CDC has never studied the health of vaccinated children when compared with the health of non vaccinated children.
Click here to read an article discussing some studies from around the world that have been done on this question. They have all found non vaccinated children to be significantly healthier than vaccinated children.
Leading Meta Researcher Finds 90% of Medical Science Untrustworthy
Here is a report from "The Atlantic Monthly."
It claims that 90% of medical research is fatally flawed.
More precisely, it describes the work of one of the most respected, published, in demand meta researchers and how he has come up with the 90% figure.
"Indeed, given the breadth of the potential problems raised at the meeting, can any medical-research studies be trusted?
That question has been central to Ioannidis’s career. He’s what’s known as a meta-researcher, and he’s become one of the world’s foremost experts on the credibility of medical research.
He and his team have shown, again and again, and in many different ways, that much of what biomedical researchers conclude in published studies—conclusions that doctors keep in mind when they prescribe antibiotics or blood-pressure medication, or when they advise us to consume more fiber or less meat, or when they recommend surgery for heart disease or back pain—is misleading, exaggerated, and often flat-out wrong.
He charges that as much as 90 percent of the published medical information that doctors rely on is flawed. His work has been widely accepted by the medical community; it has been published in the field’s top journals, where it is heavily cited; and he is a big draw at conferences.
Given this exposure, and the fact that his work broadly targets everyone else’s work in medicine, as well as everything that physicians do and all the health advice we get, Ioannidis may be one of the most influential scientists alive.
Yet for all his influence, he worries that the field of medical research is so pervasively flawed, and so riddled with conflicts of interest, that it might be chronically resistant to change—or even to publicly admitting that there’s a problem."
Click here to read the entire article from the November, 2010 issue on the magazine's website.
It claims that 90% of medical research is fatally flawed.
More precisely, it describes the work of one of the most respected, published, in demand meta researchers and how he has come up with the 90% figure.
"Indeed, given the breadth of the potential problems raised at the meeting, can any medical-research studies be trusted?
That question has been central to Ioannidis’s career. He’s what’s known as a meta-researcher, and he’s become one of the world’s foremost experts on the credibility of medical research.
He and his team have shown, again and again, and in many different ways, that much of what biomedical researchers conclude in published studies—conclusions that doctors keep in mind when they prescribe antibiotics or blood-pressure medication, or when they advise us to consume more fiber or less meat, or when they recommend surgery for heart disease or back pain—is misleading, exaggerated, and often flat-out wrong.
He charges that as much as 90 percent of the published medical information that doctors rely on is flawed. His work has been widely accepted by the medical community; it has been published in the field’s top journals, where it is heavily cited; and he is a big draw at conferences.
Given this exposure, and the fact that his work broadly targets everyone else’s work in medicine, as well as everything that physicians do and all the health advice we get, Ioannidis may be one of the most influential scientists alive.
Yet for all his influence, he worries that the field of medical research is so pervasively flawed, and so riddled with conflicts of interest, that it might be chronically resistant to change—or even to publicly admitting that there’s a problem."
Click here to read the entire article from the November, 2010 issue on the magazine's website.
Government Says Vaccines Cause Epilepsy, Claims Rise to 1/20 is a Coincidence
"The rate of epilepsy among children and the elderly has been skyrocketing, with 1 in 20 children under five now suffering from the seizure condition in the United States.
More and more parents say that vaccines triggered their children's seizure disorders.
The government maintains that while vaccines can trigger febrile seizures, the many cases of epilepsy that begin immediately following infant vaccination are merely coincidental or were bound to occur eventually."
Click here to read the story from January 22nd, 2016 in the Examiner.
More and more parents say that vaccines triggered their children's seizure disorders.
The government maintains that while vaccines can trigger febrile seizures, the many cases of epilepsy that begin immediately following infant vaccination are merely coincidental or were bound to occur eventually."
Click here to read the story from January 22nd, 2016 in the Examiner.